After reviewing the presentation, compose a 2-paragraph response in which you address each of the following points:

Click on the following link to The Creation of New Knowledge. http://library.devry.edu/pdfs/Peer_Review_PPT.pdf The PDF presentation contains 20 slides that will introduce the peer review cycle.

After reviewing the presentation, compose a 2-paragraph response in which you address each of the following points:

  • In your own words, identify points in the peer review cycle that seem especially important and explain why.
  • How does an editor differ from a peer reviewer? Use at least two points to support your response.
  • Based on this information, explain whether your article for this week was peer reviewed? How can you determine this information?
  • As you work on your research in this class, where specifically can you look to find peer-reviewed information?