Managing actual or potential mass casualty events is just the application of normal activity on grander scale for emergency services and community agencies. Or is it?
Managing actual or potential mass casualty events is just the application of normal activity on grander scale for emergency services and community agencies. Or is it?
Order Description
Discuss the following statement;
Managing actual or potential mass casualty events is just the application of normal activity on grander scale for emergency services and community agencies. Or is it?
Take into account the FEMA and WHO guidelines for mass casualty preparedness and surge capacity.
relate the subject to nursing in KSA if applicable
Well-structured argument that answers the question in word document with the appropriate use of headings formatting and referencing
I would like the structure to be:
Introduction > contains a proper hook to grasp the readers aatention and should contains the numbers of disasters ( natural or manmade) in the recent years using CRED database the definition of key terms.
Disaster preparedness > related to FEMA and WHO guidelines fro mass causalities preparedness.
Surge capacities> raising normal activities to meet unusual events.
Community resilience > the shared responsibilities.
writer reflection > the actual magnitude of disaster can vary from one type to another and it might not be measurable; however raising the normal activity to meet unusual event including the community as individuals organizations and government could ease some serious consequences of a disaster and help to avoid future disasters.
Conclusion: summarize previous points and dont add new concept.
. .
The post Managing actual or potential mass casualty events is just the application of normal activity on grander scale for emergency services and community agencies. Or is it? appeared first on My Nursing Paper.
